New Delhi :The Supreme Court has declined to accept the contention that the commitments made by a political party in its manifesto, leading to direct or indirect financial help to the public at large, could be termed as a corrupt practice by a candidate of the party.
A bench comprising justices Surya Kant and K V Viswanathan said the court has carefully perused the material placed on record and also heard counsel, representing the petitioner Shashanka J. Sreedhara, at considerable length. “The contention of the learned counsel that the commitments by a political party in its manifesto, which eventually lead to direct or indirect financial help to the public at large, will also amount to corrupt practice by a candidate of that party, is too far-fetched and cannot be accepted”, said the bench, in an order passed on May 17. The order was recently uploaded on the apex court website.
The apex court, stressing it is not keen on entertaining such a question elaborately in the instant case, said: “In any case, in the facts and circumstances of these cases, we need not to go into such a question elaborately. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed”. The bench, however, kept the question of law open, which could be decided in an appropriate case.