Srinagar: In a heated digital exchange, People's Democratic Party (PDP) leader Waheed Para, MLA from Pulwama, and National Conference (NC) leader Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi, MP from Srinagar, publicly clashed over their parties' stances on Article 370 and parliamentary actions affecting Jammu and Kashmir.
Para ignited the exchange by questioning Mehdi's approach and commitment to restoring Jammu and Kashmir's special status under Article 370. He raised several pointed inquiries, including why Mehdi had not introduced a parliamentary resolution condemning the 2019 abrogation.
"Why didn't you propose a resolution in Parliament condemning the abrogation of Article 370 on August 5, 2019, given that it was a parliamentary decision? This historic change reshaped the political landscape of Jammu & Kashmir, and a formal resolution would have been a strong symbolic gesture," Para said in his post on X, formerly Twitter.
Para also questioned Mehdi's decision to prioritize introducing a bill on liquor sales restrictions over a bill on Article 370, suggesting the latter would have carried symbolic significance. "If you could introduce a bill to restrict liquor sales in J&K, why didn't you bring forward a bill focused on restoring Article 370 or re-establishing J&K's special status? Such an initiative could have at least opened a dialogue on one of the most contentious issues affecting the region."
In a rebuttal, Mehdi countered Para's accusations, defending his "pragmatic approach" to navigating a BJP-majority Parliament. Mehdi argued that introducing a resolution condemning the abrogation might only serve to "strengthen the parliamentary record against Article 370," risking a backlash due to a lack of support within the ruling government. "The struggle for the return of our rights is not a ladder to a chair for me," Mehdi stated, emphasizing that his approach was driven by sentiment and conviction rather than optics. He defended his record by citing his efforts to begin conversations with parliamentary colleagues, particularly on the UAPA, a law widely criticized for enabling prolonged detentions.
While taking a dig at Para, Mehdi said, "Also, when the assembly elections were announced, I took this matter to my party, and it gracefully agreed to it, making it part of the manifesto. Now, after being elected to the assembly, I am confident my party is as committed to it as it was before. I have no confusion about it. I’ve never tweeted (X) and then deleted my statement about it. By the way, I missed your opinion on the reservation issue during the elections. What was it?"
Para, however, challenged Mehdi's remarks on "pragmatism," accusing the National Conference of adopting a more "meek and surrendered" stance. He cited past instances where Mehdi had dismissed "pragmatism" as a cover for inaction, remarking that the "palpable sense of meekness and surrender" he now saw from the National Conference was unexpected. Para asserted that introducing a resolution in Parliament would not only confirm the party's opposition to Article 370’s revocation but also rally support from INDIA bloc allies.
He also said: "Be that as it may, I don’t grudge NC its shift toward 'pragmatism'—nor do the people who voted for NC. However, people are amused at the very palpable sense of meekness and surrender demonstrated by the NC government in its offerings of apology to the BJP. And I’ve heard you've voiced your disgust at the Kani shawl offerings among your friends and well-wishers, even if you haven’t pointed out the same to the one who gifted the shawls."