New Delhi: Despite warnings and guidelines issued by top environmental experts to conserve the ecologically sensitive Wayanad district in northeast Kerala that is part of the Western Ghats, this week's landslide tragedy that claimed 292 lives eventually happened.
Wayanad is the only plateau in Kerala and forms a continuation of the Mysore Plateau, the southern portion of the Deccan Plateau. It is set high in the Western Ghats with altitudes ranging from 700 to 2,100 metres.
Wayanad is widely recognised as an ecologically sensitive area (ESA). This distinction arises from its rich biodiversity, unique ecosystems, critical water resources, and the challenges posed by human activities and environmental changes. The region is home to a remarkable diversity of plant and animal species. Its forests harbour numerous endemic and endangered species. The region’s vegetation ranges from tropical rainforests to deciduous forests, each supporting a unique array of life forms.
The Western Ghats, where Wayanad is located, is one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots. Wayanad contributes significantly to this status with its high levels of species endemism. Many species of plants, mammals, birds, amphibians, and insects found in Wayanad are not found anywhere else.
However, rapid urbanisation, agriculture, and plantation activities have led to significant habitat fragmentation in Wayanad. This fragmentation threatens the survival of many species, particularly those that require large, contiguous habitats. Logging, conversion of forest land for agriculture, and other human activities have led to deforestation. This loss of forest cover results in reduced biodiversity, soil erosion, and altered hydrological cycles.
It was in view of this that the Centre commissioned studies to ensure the protection of the ecologically sensitive areas in the Western Ghats, including Wayanad. The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP), also known as the Gadgil Commission after its chairman Madhav Gadgil, was an environmental research commission appointed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests of India. The primary objective of the commission was to assess the ecology of the Western Ghats and propose measures to protect and sustain its fragile environment. This included assessment of the ecology, zonation of the region, policy recommendations and sustainable development.
The panel proposed classifying the entire Western Ghats into an ecologically sensitive area (ESA). The report classified the 142 taluks within the Western Ghats boundary into three ecologically sensitive zones (ESZs) with varying degrees of protection. In ESZ 1, the highest protection level with strict regulations on developmental activities was recommended. Moderate protection with regulated development was recommended for ESZ 2. For ESZ 3, lesser protection with permissible sustainable development practices was recommended.
In ESZ 1 and ESZ 2, activities like mining, quarrying, and large-scale construction should be banned. The report also recommended phasing out existing harmful activities in these zones. It called for encouraging organic farming, agroforestry, and other sustainable agricultural practices to reduce the ecological footprint.
The panel also called for ensuring the participation of local communities in conservation efforts and decision-making processes. This includes providing them with alternative livelihoods and education on sustainable practices.
Another major recommendation was the establishment of a Western Ghats Ecology Authority (WGEA) to oversee the implementation of conservation measures and ensure compliance with regulations. The commission submitted its report in August 2011.
However, the Gadgil Commission report was criticised for being excessively environment-friendly and not in tune with the ground realities. The criticism came from various stakeholders, including state governments, industries, and local communities, who feared that stringent regulations would hinder economic growth and development. The recommendation for the constitution of a new body called WGEA also came in for much criticism.
In Kerala too, certain sections of people strongly protested the implementation of the report since most of the farmers obtained their livelihood from the hilly regions in Wayanad. During the 20th century, a very large number of people migrated from southern Kerala and acquired forest land in Wayanad and other areas.
Due to the controversy and opposition, the Government of India set up another panel, the Kasturirangan Committee, headed by eminent space scientist K Kasturirangan, to review the Gadgil Commission's recommendations.