New Delhi:Indian Police Service (IPS) officer D Roopa and Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer Rohini Sindhuri, informed the Supreme Court on Thursday that they were unable to reach a settlement and they would be proceeding for trial in the case. After this, the apex court allowed Roopa to withdraw her plea seeking quashing of the criminal defamation case initiated against her by Sindhuri.
The matter came up for hearing before a bench comprising justices Abhay S Oka, Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Augustine George Masih. The bench was informed that the parties were unable to reach an agreement to settle the matter and they would be proceeding for trial in the case, after which the court allowed the withdrawal of the plea.
During the hearing, the bench questioned the intent of the IPS officer, behind the allegations made in her social media posts against IAS Sindhuri. “How is your client (Roopa) even concerned with making such posts in the public domain? Were you some investigating officer in any of such allegations you made in the posts made in the public domain against the respondent….”, asked the bench.
The bench suggested that parties can amicably settle the dispute instead of going through litigation, which can harm their careers as bureaucrats. The bench orally observed that senior bureaucrats are spending more time in lawyers’ offices than on their respective work.
Roopa’s counsel argued that his client was acting as a whistleblower against the wrongful acts of Sindhuri. However, the bench asked, "Your client couldn't move her grievance within the department", and further queried, “You decided to go one-on-one against her. Isn't this defamatory? You know every aspect of the criminal justice system, still, you did this?”