చెల్లి పెళ్లికి ప్రియుడితో కలిసి వచ్చిన ఫ్రిదా - Freida Pinto's Sister Gets MARRIED

'స్లమ్ డాగ్ మిలియనీర్' ఫేమ్ ఫ్రిదా పింటో ప్రియుడు కోరి ట్రాన్తో కలిసి సందడి చేసింది. చెల్లి షరోన్ పింటో పెళ్లికి వచ్చిన ఈ ప్రేమజంట వీక్షకులకు కనువిందు చేసింది.

ఫ్రిదా

Published : Dec 12, 2019, 8:33 PM IST

భారతీయ సంతతికి చెందిన అంతర్జాతీయ నటి ఫ్రిదా పింటో తన ప్రియుడు కోరి ట్రాన్‌తో కలిసి చెల్లెలు అయిన షరోన్‌ పింటో పెళ్లికి వచ్చింది. విదేశీ ఫొటోగ్రాఫర్‌ కోరి ట్రాన్‌తో గత నెల్లోనే నిశ్చితార్థం చేసుకొంది ఫ్రిదా పింటో.

బాయ్ఫ్రెండ్తో ఫ్రిదా

'స్లమ్‌ డాగ్‌ మిలియనీర్‌' చిత్రంతో వెండితెరపైకి వచ్చి అలరించింది పింటో. షరోన్‌ పింటో పెళ్లిలో ఫ్రిదా కాబోయో భర్త కోరితో కలిసి దిగిన ఫొటోలు ఇప్పుడు సామాజిక మాధ్యమాల్లో హల్‌చల్‌ చేస్తున్నాయి. భారతీయ సంప్రదాయం ప్రకారం ఇంట్లో అక్క పెళ్లి జరిగిన తరువాతే చెల్లెలు వివాహం జరుగుతుంది. కానీ ఇక్కడ అక్క (ఫ్రిదా) కంటే ముందే చెల్లెలు (షరోన్‌) తొందరపడిందని సినీజనాలు సరదాగా నవ్వుకుంటున్నారు. చెల్లి షరోన్‌ పింటో పెళ్లిలో ఫ్రిదా సంప్రదాయ దుస్తులతో ఒంటినిండా నగలు ధరించి అందంగా ముస్తాబై సందడి చేసింది.

ఫ్రిదా పింటో

ఇవీ చూడండి.. మాది గురుశిష్యుల సంబంధం: చిరు

బాయ్ఫ్రెండ్తో ఫ్రిదా

ఫ్రిదా పింటో

ఇవీ చూడండి.. మాది గురుశిష్యుల సంబంధం: చిరు

RESTRICTION SUMMARY: AP CLIENTS ONLY
SHOTLIST:
ASSOCIATED PRESS - AP CLIENTS ONLY
The Hague - 12 December 2019
1. Mid shot of Myanmar representation arriving at ICJ
2. Suu Kyi, agent for Myanmar representation at ICJ and Foreign minister of Myanmar, enters court
3. Various of UN flag
4. ICJ exterior
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE - AP CLIENTS ONLY
The Hague - 12 December 2019
5. Wide of courtroom
6. Mid of judges
7. Wide of courtroom
8. SOUNDBITE (English) Paul S.Reicher, Lawyer representing Gambia:++SOUNDBITE INCLUDES CUTAWAYS++
"What is most striking, Mr. President, is what Myanmar has not denied. So I will begin there. Myanmar has not denied that the UN fact-finding mission reached this conclusion. There is no reasonable conclusion to draw other than the inference of genocidal intent from the state's pattern of conduct. Nor has Myanmar denied that the fact-finding mission reached this conclusion based on seven specific indicators which it found to be, quote, indicators of genocidal intent in the international case law. Nor has Myanmar challenged the propriety of the fact-finding missions use of these seven indicators or any one of them for inferring genocidal intent. Professor Akhavan identified them on Tuesday. I called them to your attention today only for the purpose of considering what Myanmar said or failed to say about them yesterday. This is the first indicator of genocidal intent. First, the Tatmadaw's extreme brutality during its attacks on the Rohingya. Professor Akhavan and Mr. Lowenstein gave you many heart-rending examples of this from the reports of the UN fact-finding mission. Myanmar did not deny any of it. In fact, its agent admitted that, quote, It cannot be ruled out that disproportionate force was used by members of the defence services. Second, the organized nature of the Tatmadaws destruction. Mr. Lowenstein showed you how the Tatmadaw employed the same brutal tactics in each Rohingya village in clearance operations that were planned and ordered by senior military staff. Myanmar did not deny this, nor did they deny that three hundred and ninety-two Rohingya villages were systematically destroyed either totally or partially during these operations. Third, the enormity and nature of the sexual violence perpetrated against women and girls during the clearance operations. We heard nothing about sexual violence from Myanmar yesterday. Not a single word about it, not from the agent, not from any of their counsel. Because it is undeniable and unspeakable, they chose to ignore it completely. I can't really blame them. I would hate to be the one having to defend it. Fourth, the insulting, derogatory, racist and exclusionary utterance of Myanmar officials and others prior, during and after the clearance operations. Myanmar did not deny any of this easier, nor could it. The agent even underscored its significance."
9. Mid of Myanmar representation
STORYLINE:
Lawyers seeking to halt what they allege is an ongoing genocide in Myanmar, slammed on Thursday Nobel prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi's defence of her country's armed forces, saying that the fall pro-democracy icon chose to ignore "unspeakable" acts committed against civilians.
Acting on behalf of a large group of Muslim nations, Gambia requested emergency legal proceedings at the UN's top court to recognize that Myanmar's armed forces committed genocide against the Rohingya minority in 2017 and that violations continue.
It wants The Hague-based court to take "all measures within its power to prevent all acts that amount to or contribute to the crime of genocide" in Myanmar.
The hearings have seen the astonishing spectacle of the Nobel Peace Prize laureate defending the very army that ordered her kept under house arrest for some 15 years.
"There is no reasonable conclusion to draw other than the inference of genocidal intent from the state's pattern of conduct," Lawyer Paul Reicher told the International Court of Justice.
"We heard nothing about sexual violence from Myanmar yesterday, not a single word about it," Reicher said.
"Because it is undeniable and unspeakable, they chose to ignore it completely. I can't really blame them. I would hate having to be the one to defend it."
===========================================================
Clients are reminded:
(i) to check the terms of their licence agreements for use of content outside news programming and that further advice and assistance can be obtained from the AP Archive on: Tel +44 (0) 20 7482 7482 Email: info@aparchive.com
(ii) they should check with the applicable collecting society in their Territory regarding the clearance of any sound recording or performance included within the AP Television News service
(iii) they have editorial responsibility for the use of all and any content included within the AP Television News service and for libel, privacy, compliance and third party rights applicable to their Territory.

For All Latest Updates